Home›Agents›UiPath Agents

AgentenCode evidence profileAutomation

✓ Editorially reviewedChecked: October 1, 2026

Agent profile · Automation

UiPath Agents

UiPath Agents is classified by AgentenCode as an enterprise agents / agentic automation from UiPath. It belongs to the Automation category. This English profile does not maintain a separate factual record: it renders the same underlying evidence, trust and history data as the German profile.

UiPathAutomationOrganizations

View profile ↓Check sources ↓

Automationeditorial classification

UiPathprovider

10 primary sourcessource status

October 1, 2026last verification

AgentenTrust 2.0 · EU & governance evidence

Trust, privacy and control evidence for UiPath Agents

Direct answer: AgentenCode currently documents 9 of 36 normalized trust controls for this profile. Missing fields remain Unknown and are never automatically interpreted as “no”.

EU AI ActEvidence context only. AgentenCode does not infer legal applicability or compliance from individual product controls.

GDPRPrivacy and security signals are documented field by field. Data residency alone is not a compliance or transfer assessment.

Privacy contextPrivacy & data0 of 8 documentedResidency, training, retention, DPA, subprocessors and processing scope.

Security contextSecurity & access6 of 10 documentedEncryption, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, roles and credential handling.

Human controlHuman control0 of 10 documentedApproval, oversight, permissions and stop or rollback controls.

TraceabilityAudit & traceability3 of 8 documentedAudit logs, APIs, SIEM, observability, tracing and activity history.

Important: these numbers show evidence coverage, not a product rating. 0 of 10 means that no field-level public evidence is stored for those ten controls in the current dataset. It does not mean the product lacks those capabilities.

Field-level evidence

Documented controls and values from primary sources.

Documented yesDocumented valueUnknown remains unknown

High confidence

Governance · Audit logs · API

Yes — documented

Automation Cloud exposes audit logs through documented APIs.

Scope: automation_cloud_audit · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · Audit logs · Available

Yes — documented

Agent activities have documented platform logging and audit support.

Scope: uipath_agent_activity · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · Audit logs · Retention days

The documented AI Trust Layer log window for agent operations is 60 days.

Scope: ai_trust_layer_agent_operations · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · RBAC

Yes — documented

RBAC is documented for controlling agent integration access.

Scope: uipath_agents_and_mcp_integrations · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · SCIM

Yes — documented

Automation Cloud organization identities used to access Agents can be provisioned with SCIM.

Scope: uipath_automation_cloud_org_access · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · SSO · Saml

Yes — documented

UiPath Agents running in Automation Cloud inherit organization SAML SSO access controls.

Scope: uipath_automation_cloud_org_access · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Governance · Tracing

Yes — documented

Agent traces provide detailed run-level observability and auditability.

Scope: uipath_agents · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Protocols · Mcp · Client

Yes — documented

UiPath Agents can consume MCP servers as tools.

Scope: uipath_agents · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Security · Customer-managed keys

Yes — documented

CMK encryption is available for Agent trace data as an opt-in feature.

Scope: agent_traces_opt_in · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Security · Encryption · At rest

AES-256

UiPath explicitly documents AES-256 at-rest encryption for Agents trace data and AI Trust Layer data flows.

Scope: uipath_agents_traces_and_ai_trust_layer · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

High confidence

Security · Encryption · In transit

TLS 1.2+

UiPath explicitly documents TLS 1.2+ for Agents trace and AI Trust Layer traffic.

Scope: uipath_agents_traces_and_ai_trust_layer · verified 2026-10-01 · Primary source ↗

Evidence-backed overview

What is UiPath Agents?

Product-specific evidence for UiPath Agents

This profile links 10 unique primary sources across the product profile, field-level evidence, trust controls and documented relations. The points below describe this product’s stored evidence rather than generic characteristics of Automatisierung.

Customer-Managed Keys

Yes · Scope: agent_traces_opt_in · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

Verschlüsselung at rest

AES-256 · Scope: uipath_agents_traces_and_ai_trust_layer · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

Verschlüsselung in transit

TLS 1.2+ · Scope: uipath_agents_traces_and_ai_trust_layer · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

Audit Log API

Yes · Scope: automation_cloud_audit · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

Audit Logs

Yes · Scope: uipath_agent_activity · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

Audit-Log-Aufbewahrung

60 · Scope: ai_trust_layer_agent_operations · verified 2026-10-01.

Primary source ↗

AgentenCode treats this page as a reference profile rather than a ranking. Product facts are separated from editorial classification, and the profile is tied to a specific verification date. If a capability is not backed by sufficiently precise public evidence, it remains unknown instead of being inferred from marketing language or from similar products.

1primary source

11field-level evidence claims

9documented trust controls

4history events

How to read the evidence

The field-level evidence layer records a value, a scope, a confidence level, a verification date and one or more primary sources. Scope matters: an enterprise-only security feature must not be generalized to every plan or deployment surface. The same rule applies to hosting, privacy, audit and protocol claims.

AgentenCode also keeps Unknown distinct from false. A missing claim means the public dataset does not currently contain sufficiently precise evidence for that field. A negative value is used only when a reliable primary source explicitly documents a restriction or non-availability.

Decision context

Provider and category

UiPath Agents is documented under Automation and is associated with UiPath. Category labels help navigation but do not replace product-specific evidence.

Verification status

The public profile is marked editorially reviewed and was last checked on October 1, 2026.

Trust coverage

9 of 36 normalized trust controls currently have field-level public evidence. The remaining controls are not treated as negative findings.

Source-first use

For procurement, security or legal decisions, use the linked primary sources and verify the plan, region and configuration that apply to your organization.

Capabilities, strengths and deployment checks for UiPath Agents

UiPath Agents is classified as Enterprise Agents / Agentic Automation from UiPath. The profile’s editorial layer is derived from the stored use cases, strengths and checks below; claims about security, privacy or governance remain separate and require field-level evidence.

Backoffice

This use case is part of the stored profile for UiPath Agents. The related strength is “Verbindung von Agenten und RPA”. In a production evaluation, the practical boundary to verify is: Agentische Entscheidungen von deterministischen RPA-Schritten trennen.

Dokumentenprozesse

This use case is part of the stored profile for UiPath Agents. The related strength is “Human-in-the-loop”. In a production evaluation, the practical boundary to verify is: Eskalationen definieren.

Operations

This use case is part of the stored profile for UiPath Agents. The related strength is “Enterprise-Automation”. In a production evaluation, the practical boundary to verify is: Zugriffe auf produktive Systeme begrenzen.

Agentic Automation

This use case is part of the stored profile for UiPath Agents. The related strength is “Bestehendes UiPath-Ökosystem”. In a production evaluation, the practical boundary to verify is: Agentische Entscheidungen von deterministischen RPA-Schritten trennen.

What to verify before adoption

Agentische Entscheidungen von deterministischen RPA-Schritten trennen. Treat undocumented controls as Unknown and verify the exact plan, region and deployment scope.
Eskalationen definieren. Treat undocumented controls as Unknown and verify the exact plan, region and deployment scope.
Zugriffe auf produktive Systeme begrenzen. Treat undocumented controls as Unknown and verify the exact plan, region and deployment scope.

Editorial boundary: The use-case and strength descriptions are product-specific editorial context based on the stored profile. Trust, privacy and governance statements are only presented as facts when field-level primary-source evidence exists.

Verified history

The public history layer records only confirmed profile changes and verification events. Monitoring signals are not published as product facts until they have been reviewed.

October 1, 2026 · Source Maintenance
October 1, 2026 · Source Maintenance
September 30, 2026 · Verification Update
September 28, 2026 · Schema Upgrade

Official sources

This profile links 10 unique primary sources across the product profile, field-level evidence, trust layer and documented relations. Provider documentation remains authoritative when the product changes between verification cycles.

Frequently asked questions

What is UiPath Agents?

UiPath Agents is listed by AgentenCode as an automation agent or agentic product from UiPath.

How much trust evidence is documented for UiPath Agents?

The current trust layer documents 9 of 36 normalized controls. Missing controls remain unknown rather than being treated as false.

When was this profile last checked?

The current profile verification date is October 1, 2026. The linked primary sources remain authoritative if the product changes between checks.

Method note: AgentenCode does not certify GDPR or EU AI Act compliance. It documents evidence that can support a separate legal, security or procurement assessment.